Friday, March 28, 2008
Observation 11: Field Trip to Lee Gallery
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Observation 10: Personal Relationships
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Observation 9: Follow Through Ch. 9
I do not think Kimball or Martinez would find Mukherjee’s essay to be persuasive. I personally saw this essay as a more informative essay rather than a persuasive essay. I cannot really see where she is arguing for anything, but just describing the way she sees society. She talks about how nationalities are divided in the US, some of them at their own will. For example, she says that some people get upset because their children forget or never acquire the culture of their country of origin. She expresses that it is alright and expected to form to the culture where you are living. Crevecoeur’s idea of a “new race” is similar to Mukherjee’s ideas in that she says people tend to form to the culture around them, and in turn, people become similar to each other.
Mukherjee discusses the term “hyphenated Americans” and says she feels these classifications add to problems with race tension. Using these terms singles out individuals and creates prejudice. She mentions fighting discrimination through protests and lawsuits. I disagree with this because lawsuits cause everyone to be scared to speak their opinions, rather than solve problems. She says she is sometimes condemned because she acknowledges erosion of memory (of culture) is a natural result of emigration. She implies that a merging of cultures is beneficial and is not something that should be resisted.